Tuesday, July 31, 2012

3 Dangers of Artificial Turf

Originally written by me, Maya van Rossum, the Delaware Riverkeeper, as guest blogger for Maria Rodale, CEO of Rodale, posted at http://www.mariasfarmcountrykitchen.com/.

Artificial Turf on Radnor Township, PA
being used and pooped on by geese raising other health issues

Covering our community and school fields with plastic grass and rubber soil is a disturbing and concerning trend. It has become a status symbol for many communities, where they are all too willing to raid already tight education budgets and sacrifice good education for an artificial field.

While the science is far from settled, there is enough information to demonstrate that artificial turf may pose significant environment, health, safety and quality of life threats to our communities. So far, the studies have found that artificial turf is…

Leaching Toxins in Our Environment: Studies have concluded that artificial turf has the potential to pollute our environment with dangerous toxins like Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, phthalates, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, and lead. As a result, runoff from an artificial turf field that drains to a local creek can pose a risk of toxic effects. And kids playing on these fields are exposed to leaching and off-gassing chemicals known to have carcinogenic, reprotoxic, mutagenic and endocrine disrupting effects.

Increasing Sports Injury Severity: Researchers are studying the effects of artificial turf on increasing sports injuries, including increasing the frequency and severity of head injuries, increasing the potential for infection and skin burns

Creating Heat Islands: Artificial turf gets much hotter than grass. Studies have found temperatures on artificial turf exceeding temperatures on nearby natural grass in ranges of 39° F to 95° to even 140° F hotter. The result is artificial turf fields, where kids and adults are expected to play their best, at temperatures 117 to 157 degrees and even hotter.

Decisionmakers need to recognize that until the full impacts of artificial turf are studied, understood and known, they need to make the protective decision, the risk averse decision, the decision to keep natural grass in place.

While grass fields are not as environmentally beneficial as forests, wetlands, or meadows, they are many times better than plastic and rubber turf. Grass is a natural pollution filter and stormwater management system, preventing increased storm runoff and cleaning rain water as it flows to our creeks and streams -- artificial turf provides no such benefits.

Plus, with so much artificial nature and artificial play already in the lives of kids, providing living lawns, where a child can quietly pull blades of grass while talking to friends, that will cool their backs as they lay back to watch the clouds blow by, or cushion a fall during a sports game, is a small but significant quality we should protect in their lives.

Maya K. van Rossum is the Delaware Riverkeeper, and has led the Delaware Riverkeeper Network (DRN) since 1994. The DRN is a regional nonprofit advocacy organization that monitors the river and all of its tributaries for threats and challenges, and advocates, educates, and litigates for protection, restoration, and change.

Monday, July 2, 2012

Deepening Deception by Army Corps a Travesty - Act Now

Delaware Riverkeeper Maya van Rossum
delivers a voluminous set of comments
against deepening to the Army Corps
The Army Corps is playing a bait and switch.  They have been unable to get an approval from the State of Delaware for the controversial deepening project and so have now submitted application materials for "maintenance dredging" but, surprise surprise, their maintenance dredging application asks to take the River down to 46 feet, the exact maximum depth of the Deepening Project.

This is the worst kind of deception — a public agency funded with public dollars trying to hoodwink the public.

Tell Delaware to deny the applications from the Army Corps.

As a nation we stand for good government, for honest government — our federal agencies need to be held to the highest standard — and a bait and switch on the public doesn't do it.