The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is given
extraordinary power to destroy lives and avoid many of the environmental
regulations that apply to every other industry when it gives approval for construction
of interstate pipelines used to transport fracked shale gas. Once FERC gives its approval to a fracked
gas pipeline it anoints the pipeline
company with the power of eminent domain, allowing the pipeline industry to
take, at will, private property, public parks, preserved forests and preserved
lands.
Despite
all this power, FERC still wants and takes more.
On
January 22, 2013, Delaware Riverkeeper Network (an environmental organization
representing communities) filed a legal action in the United States Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia challenging FERC’s approval of the
Tennessee Gas Pipeline company’s Northeast Upgrade Pipeline Project. On June 6,
2014, much to the surprise of most, the Court issued an opinion and order
finding that FERC had violated federal law (the National Environmental Policy
Act) by segmenting its environmental review of the Northeast Upgrade Project
from three other connected and interdependent Pipeline projects and by failing
to provide a meaningful analysis of the cumulative impacts of these
projects. (Delaware Riverkeeper Network, et al. v. Federal Energy Regulatory FERC,753 F.3d 1304, 1307 (D.C. Cir. 2014))
Because
of the violation of law, the Court sent the case back to FERC so it could
further consider the project and properly respond to the court’s ruling.
Despite
the Court’s clear and direct order issued well over a year ago, FERC has
determined itself above the law and is blatantly ignoring the court’s order:
FERC has not posted any activity on the public record related to the Court’s
Order, FERC has not issued any public statements relating to the remand, FERC
has not provided any public notice of any kind identifying any steps by which
FERC is carrying out the Court’s Order and FERC has refused to answer any of
the questions asked by the Delaware Riverkeeper Network as to the status of
their compliance with the court order.
This
is not the only example of FERC ignoring the intent and letter of the law in
order to harm people and benefit the pipeline companies.
Under
the Natural Gas Act, people are only able to legally challenge an approval FERC
has given to a pipeline project after they have submitted a rehearing request
to FERC, asking it to reconsider its decision, and FERC has denied that
request. Seems simple right?
E Company
applies for FERC approval,
E people
fight it and inevitably lose,
E FERC
approves the project,
E people
submit a rehearing request,
E FERC
inevitably denies that request, and
E the
people are entitled to challenge the decision in court.
But
this is not how it works in the world FERC has created.
FERC
has identified a loophole in the law that allows its decisions to go
unchallenged until it’s too late for a successful legal challenge.
When people or organizations, like the Delaware Riverkeeper
Network, have submitted rehearing requests in order to secure the FERC denial
they need to challenge an approved pipeline in court, FERC’s common practice is
to issue something called a tolling order.
A tolling order means that FERC doesn’t have to grant or deny the rehearing
request, FERC can simply sit on the peoples’ request while at the same time
FERC continues to make decisions that allow the pipeline at issue to proceed to
construction. And that is exactly what
FERC does – pipeline after pipeline people are filing requests for rehearing as
part of the effort to legally challenge a pipeline threatening their homes,
environment and communities while FERC sits and waits to issue its response
until it is virtually impossible to bring a challenge that can stop the pipeline
project.
Pipelines inflict significant harms on the communities they cut:
they take public and private lands, and
art, history and healthy environments all must fall when a pipelines wants to
cut through.
they reduce the market value and
marketability of homes, they force communities to live next to the hazards of a
dangerous pipeline while taking from them the full use and enjoyment of their
homes, they contribute to climate instability with their polluting emissions,
they destroy and degrade critical habitats such as forests, streams and
wetlands, they create water pollution and air pollution, they increase
stormwater runoff and deprive our streams and drinking water aquifers of
recharge, they increase erosion, diminish recreation and ecotourism, they harm
farming and businesses of all kinds,
All of this for a fracked gas energy source that experts on
all sides of the issue say will peak by the year 2020 and be in serious decline
by the year 2040.
No agency can be allowed to operate above the law and with
such callous disregard for the people the way FERC is operating. Given what is at stake – the healthy lives of
people living today, and the future lives of the generations to come – it is
time for Congress and the Courts to act to bring FERC in line.
If
you want to help us find a Congressional Champion so we can secure an
Independent Investigation into the Abuse of Process and Law by the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC) please sign on:
If you are an individual that wants
to join the call, please sign our petition and pass it on at:
http://bit.ly/DRN-PetitionToReviewFERC
If you are the leader of an
organization concerned about the abuse of power at FERC you can sign on to our
organizational sign on letter at: http://bit.ly/SignOnGAOReview
No comments:
Post a Comment