Less than 24 hours after
FERC approval was granted for tree clearing of “Pipeline Loop 323” that would
cut through the Delaware River Watershed, Tennessee Gas Pipeline (TGP) chainsaw
crews, arriving in trucks with Wisconsin license plates, began invading the
forests and cutting thousands of 70-year old trees to make way for the
Northeast Upgrade Pipeline project (NEUP).
The NEUP is being constructed to carry fracked shale gas from drilling
zones in Pennsylvania across into New Jersey and on to other markets.
TGP clearly rushed its tree
clearing plans in order to avoid any possibility that they might be stopped by
the efforts of citizens to get the Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC) to
step in and require a DRBC review and docket before the project could proceed
within the boundaries of our watershed.
Why would TGP be so
fearful?
The past two weeks the
Delaware Riverkeeper Network along with a rising tide of concerned citizens
have been demanding their intervention and we are on solid legal and moral
footing when doing so.
The DRBC Rules of Practice
and Procedure require DRBC review and docketing for pipeline projects that
“pass in, on, under or across an existing or proposed reservoir or recreation
project area as designated in the Comprehensive Plan.” The NEUP is one
such pipeline project -- it passes through the Delaware State Forest and High
Point State Park, both Comprehensive Plan areas. Therefore DRBC's
obligation to conduct a review that considers impacts on water resources is
clear, and mandatory.
DRBC has acknowledged its
failure to apply this element of the Rules of Practice and Procedure (i.e. with
regards to the passage of pipelines through Comprehensive Plan areas) for two
other upriver pipeline projects — namely the TGP 300 Line (of which the NEUP is
a part) and the 1278 Columbia Line.
In a letter dated January
30, 2013, DRBC recognized its failure to apply this Comprehensive Plan
provision to those two projects. Its
remedy is to apply an after-the-fact review and docket for the projects. But I and the Delaware Riverkeeper Network
have made it clear, this review must be applied to the NEUP as well—a review
that does not have to be after-the-fact but can happen now before the pipeline
is installed.
The review that led to
DRBC’s revelation of its legal error began well after DRBC refused such review
of the 300 Line, the 1278 Line and the NEUP, and so it clearly applies equally
to all three. (To see the DRBC Jan 30 letter and my immediate
response: http://www.delawareriverkeeper.org/resources/Letters/DRBC_NEUP_Docket_Reconsider_1.31.13.pdf)
In addition, DRBC's
decision to review the TGP 300 Line necessarily applies to the NEUP because the
NEUP is a part of that project – the NEUP does not stand alone here.
In two letters, the DRBC
has attempted to say it has performed its legal obligations on the NEUP because
it issued a water withdrawal docket for the project in July, 2012. While a water withdrawal docket was approved
by the DRBC for the NEUP, the passage of that water withdrawal docket does not
displace the DRBC’s legal obligation to review the many aspects of a project
that invades Comprehensive Plan areas. This
would be like a state agency saying that because they issued a wetlands-fill
permit for a project they don’t also have to permit it for discharging massive
amounts of pollution to the air – they are different issues required by different
parts of the agency’s laws and so fulfilling one doesn’t get the agency off the
hook for fulfilling the other.
And there is a very easy
path for the DRBC to remedy all this as it applies to the NEUP. There are two provisions in that July 2012
water withdrawal docket it issued for the NEUP which allow it to re-open the
permit to fix things when necessary, including when they have made a mistake or
get new information that demonstrates a project will harm the water resources
of our watershed and communities.
Ø
Under one of
these provisions the DRBC “reserves the right to amend, alter or rescind any
actions taken hereunder in order to insure proper control, use and management
of the water resources of the Basin.”
Ø
Under the other
provision, “The Executive Director may modify or suspend this approval or any
condition thereof, or require mitigating measures pending additional review, if
in the Executive Director’s judgment such modification or suspension is
required to protect the water resources of the Basin.”
The water resources of the
Delaware River Basin are clearly suffering here – and will suffer dramatic and
unnecessary harm if the DRBC does not step in and exercise its legal authority
to do all it can to avoid such harm – and there is a lot it can do.
Citizens and organizations
from around the region are joining us in our call for the DRBC to act. Please send your email to the DRBC and all
its Commissioners today. http://www.delawareriverkeeper.org/act-now/urgent-details.aspx?Id=139
March 6 is their next
meeting where the DRBC Commissioners can instruct the Executive Director, Carol
Collier, to intervene if she cannot find the courage to do so on her on. So please plan to take a day from your life
to join us on March 6, the day the DRBC will have the chance to begin to make
this right. We won’t be able to get the
70-year old trees and the fully healthy forest back, but there is a lot that
can be done to avoid more harm and to fix the damage already inflicted.
And please know, the
Delaware Riverkeeper Network and our colleagues including the NJ Highlands
Coalition and the NJ Sierra Club, continue to press the legal actions we have
in the works to find some protection from this project, and to set strong precedent
for all future pipeline projects here and across the nation.
An outdoor rally was held on
February 18 in Montague, NJ where an 87-year old resident is anguished by the
destruction inflicted by the Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company who took his land
through eminent domain. See video
interview here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEthCvQxKi4&list=UUBxNaY3MzWj0RFZVQSTTrhw&index=1
And take a look at the release
put out by citizens working to blockade the pipeline: http://www.notennesseepipeline.blogspot.com/
and to see what else might be in the works.